We are in a
world wherein we want to achieve unity in diversity and I believe that
international organizations best represent that goal. We unite with different
countries for a common purpose and a common objective. I’ve been familiar with
famous international organizations existent in our world today; but what I am
not familiar with is if these organizations have been effective in living up to
their purpose. International organizations are created for different reasons;
it may be because of collective interests of states, for conscious
decision-making by political elites, or from recognizing interdependence among
different states. But whatever the reason may be, I believe that what matters
is what they do to the common good.
There are a lot of international
organizations formed by powerful people all over the world; some are well known
and some are not. One of the most popular international organizations is the
United Nations (UN) which aims to promote world peace, international security,
and respect for human rights and international law. It is a big and complex
organization which allows them to solve a lot of issues but having a lot of
conflicts at the same time. It is said that the UN should not be called as such
because technically the members of the said organization are not nations but
instead they are states. Using the word nations would require them to include
the national population in the organization and not just the leaders
themselves. By this, some might think that the UN is based on popularity in
politics. Another interesting point is the use of the word “united”; using this
word to identify their organization may either mean that they are really as one
in solving world issues or it could also mean that being united is what is
required of them but they haven’t fully attained that yet.
The UN has been interfering with
different issues such as wars in the Middle East and the like to try to
maintain peace and security in our world. I was curious about how effective
they were in achieving one of their main objectives and I found out that they
are both effective and cost effective at the same time. This is because they’ve
had success in maintaining peace in around 13 countries which clearly shows
their effectiveness but also had failures in 3 countries. Even if the number
suggests that they are indeed effective in general, the cost of the conflicts
and lives lost in those 3 countries that they failed in are quite high. This
leaves the UN to ponder about their actions and find ways to improve their strategies
in maintaining peace and security.
In my personal opinion, the UN is a
symbol of the efforts of leaders all over the world wanting to build bridges
and work together for the good of mankind. Even if this is the case, some may
think that the UN is no longer needed because of reasons such as disruption in
the balance of power, ineffectiveness in avoiding wars, and basically not
fulfilling their objectives. There are always two sides in a story, some say
they are effective and necessary, some say they are not. But the bottom line is
who gets to decide their fate, the leaders or the people?
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento